PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPST vs. MAXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPST vs. MAXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPST achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than MAXJ's 2.88% return.


JPST

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*

MAXJ

1D
0.03%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.88%
6M
3.34%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPST vs. MAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.40%4.99%2.81%
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
2.88%8.97%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between JPST and MAXJ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPST vs. MAXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MAXJ
MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPST vs. MAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPSTMAXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.94

1.76

+2.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.16

5.45

+23.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

144.13

30.88

+113.25

JPST vs. MAXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPST Sharpe Ratio is 8.09, which is higher than the MAXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPST and MAXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPSTMAXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.09

3.19

+4.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

6.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.20

1.64

+1.56

Drawdowns

JPST vs. MAXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPST drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum MAXJ drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPST and MAXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSTMAXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-6.35%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-1.70%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.56%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.30%

-0.27%

Volatility

JPST vs. MAXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is 0.15%, while iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) has a volatility of 0.30%. This indicates that JPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSTMAXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

0.30%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

1.93%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54%

2.93%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.58%

5.28%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.93%

5.28%

-4.35%

JPST vs. MAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MAXJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPST vs. MAXJ - Dividend Comparison

JPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than MAXJ's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.26%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
0.98%1.01%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPST and MAXJ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAXJ has higher volatility (0.30%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPST dropped -3.28% vs MAXJ's -6.35%.

On 1-year performance, MAXJ leads with 9.25% vs 4.31% for JPST. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAXJ has performed better with a 9.25% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MAXJ.

JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.98% for MAXJ.

JPST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while MAXJ is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPST and 0.50% for MAXJ.

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.09 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPST and MAXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer