PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPSG.L vs. N4US.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPSG.L vs. N4US.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JPSG.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPSG.L is traded in GBP, while N4US.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the N4US.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPSG.L achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than N4US.L's 18.97% return.


JPSG.L

1D
-1.43%
1M
2.78%
6M
7.13%
YTD
11.87%
1Y
32.10%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
10Y*

N4US.L

1D
-1.85%
1M
-3.94%
6M
10.74%
YTD
18.97%
1Y
45.07%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
22.44%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPSG.L vs. N4US.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPSG.L
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
11.87%23.27%17.32%21.38%
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
18.97%20.97%25.93%24.81%

Correlation

The correlation between JPSG.L and N4US.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023

0.82

The correlation between JPSG.L and N4US.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPSG.L vs. N4US.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPSG.L
JPSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JPSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

N4US.L
N4US.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
N4US.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
N4US.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
N4US.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
N4US.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
N4US.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPSG.L vs. N4US.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JPSG.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPSG.LN4US.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

5.23

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

16.75

-6.64

JPSG.L vs. N4US.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the N4US.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPSG.L and N4US.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPSG.L vs. N4US.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPSG.L drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum N4US.L drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSG.L and N4US.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSG.LN4US.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-28.61%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.58%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-20.94%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-5.90%

+3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-5.12%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.68%

+0.49%

Volatility

JPSG.L vs. N4US.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JPSG.L) is 5.14%, while Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that JPSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than N4US.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSG.LN4US.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

6.00%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

15.65%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.31%

19.76%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.05%

19.07%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

19.47%

-0.42%

JPSG.L vs. N4US.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPSG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than N4US.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPSG.L vs. N4US.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPSG.L nor N4US.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPSG.L and N4US.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, N4US.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

N4US.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JPSG.L.

JPSG.L tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while N4US.L tracks JPX-Nikkei 400 USD Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JPSG.L and 0.19% for N4US.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPSG.L and N4US.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer