PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JPSG.L) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPSG.L is traded in GBP, while IJPE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IJPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPSG.L achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than IJPE.L's 13.97% return.


JPSG.L

1D
-1.43%
1M
2.78%
6M
7.13%
YTD
11.87%
1Y
32.10%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
10Y*

IJPE.L

1D
-2.24%
1M
-5.98%
6M
7.08%
YTD
13.97%
1Y
40.92%
3Y*
24.18%
5Y*
18.71%
10Y*
13.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPSG.L
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
11.87%23.27%17.32%21.38%
IJPE.L
iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
13.97%34.15%16.53%26.00%

Correlation

The correlation between JPSG.L and IJPE.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023

0.89

The correlation between JPSG.L and IJPE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPSG.L
JPSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JPSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IJPE.L
IJPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IJPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JPSG.L) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPSG.LIJPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.84

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

11.88

-1.77

JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the IJPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPSG.L and IJPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPSG.L drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum IJPE.L drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSG.L and IJPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSG.LIJPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-33.89%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-10.62%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-20.17%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-7.87%

+5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-8.55%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.44%

-0.27%

Volatility

JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JPSG.L) is 5.14%, while iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPE.L) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that JPSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSG.LIJPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

7.22%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

16.67%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.31%

20.78%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.05%

18.92%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

18.81%

+0.24%

JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPSG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPE.L's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPSG.L vs. IJPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPSG.L nor IJPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPSG.L and IJPE.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPSG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPSG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPE.L.

JPSG.L tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while IJPE.L tracks MSCI Japan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JPSG.L and 0.64% for IJPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPSG.L and IJPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer