PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPNL.L vs. N4US.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPNL.L vs. N4US.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPNL.L is traded in GBp, while N4US.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the N4US.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPNL.L achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than N4US.L's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, JPNL.L has underperformed N4US.L with an annualized return of 8.30%, while N4US.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.


JPNL.L

1D
-1.88%
1M
-4.36%
6M
5.39%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
8.30%

N4US.L

1D
-1.85%
1M
-3.94%
6M
10.74%
YTD
18.97%
1Y
45.07%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
22.44%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPNL.L vs. N4US.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
12.08%17.96%7.75%13.02%-5.78%0.85%10.24%13.26%-9.85%14.89%
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
18.97%20.97%25.93%29.18%10.71%12.23%7.53%14.95%-10.75%12.35%

Correlation

The correlation between JPNL.L and N4US.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2015

0.81

The correlation between JPNL.L and N4US.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (5 years) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPNL.L vs. N4US.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPNL.L
JPNL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

N4US.L
N4US.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
N4US.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
N4US.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
N4US.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
N4US.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
N4US.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPNL.L vs. N4US.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPNL.LN4US.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

5.23

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

16.75

-8.66

JPNL.L vs. N4US.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the N4US.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPNL.L and N4US.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPNL.L vs. N4US.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPNL.L drawdown since its inception was -38.87%, which is greater than N4US.L's maximum drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPNL.L and N4US.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPNL.LN4US.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.87%

-28.61%

-10.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-8.58%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.44%

-20.94%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.80%

-20.94%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-28.61%

+3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.34%

-5.90%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-5.12%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.68%

+0.79%

Volatility

JPNL.L vs. N4US.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) have volatilities of 5.79% and 6.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPNL.LN4US.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

6.00%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

15.65%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.36%

19.76%

-1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

19.07%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

19.47%

-3.63%

JPNL.L vs. N4US.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPNL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than N4US.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPNL.L vs. N4US.L - Dividend Comparison

JPNL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while N4US.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
0.64%0.71%0.73%1.23%1.83%1.37%1.14%2.01%1.84%1.43%1.97%1.77%
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPNL.L and N4US.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, N4US.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

N4US.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPNL.L.

JPNL.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while N4US.L tracks JPX-Nikkei 400 USD Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JPNL.L and 0.19% for N4US.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPNL.L and N4US.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer