JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L
JPNL.L (Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR) and IJPE.L (iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Japan Equities funds - JPNL.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while IJPE.L tracks the MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPNL.L returned 9.84%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for IJPE.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPNL.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for IJPE.L.
Performance
JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JPNL.L is traded in GBp, while IJPE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IJPE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPNL.L achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly lower than IJPE.L's 18.01% return. Over the past 10 years, JPNL.L has underperformed IJPE.L with an annualized return of 9.84%, while IJPE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.88% annualized return.
JPNL.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 6M
- 14.31%
- 1Y
- 31.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
IJPE.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- 18.01%
- 6M
- 19.21%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 26.63%
- 5Y*
- 19.09%
- 10Y*
- 14.88%
JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPNL.L Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR | 14.78% | 17.96% | 7.74% | 12.66% | -5.98% | 1.37% | 8.23% | 15.36% | -9.97% | 14.63% |
IJPE.L iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating | 17.95% | 34.15% | 16.52% | 30.17% | -0.54% | 4.85% | 15.09% | 8.84% | -16.11% | 23.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPNL.L and IJPE.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2012 | 0.66 |
The correlation between JPNL.L and IJPE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (5 years) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Technology
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Financial Services
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Communication Services
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Healthcare
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Basic Materials
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Consumer Defensive
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Real Estate
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Utilities
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Energy
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPNL.L
IJPE.L
JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPNL.L | IJPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.51 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 4.99 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 16.72 | -6.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPNL.L | IJPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.75 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 1.02 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.79 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.55 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPNL.L drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum IJPE.L drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPNL.L and IJPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPNL.L | IJPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -33.89% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -10.61% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.44% | -20.17% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -20.17% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -33.89% | +8.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.29% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -8.51% | +3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.18% | +0.19% |
Volatility
JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) is 3.61%, while iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPE.L) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that JPNL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPNL.L | IJPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 3.89% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 15.06% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 19.29% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 18.65% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 18.81% | -0.97% |
JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPNL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPE.L's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPNL.L vs. IJPE.L - Dividend Comparison
JPNL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while IJPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPE.L iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPNL.L Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 1.23% | 1.83% | 1.37% | 1.14% | 1.98% | 1.84% | 1.43% | 1.96% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPNL.L and IJPE.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPNL.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPNL.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPE.L.
JPNL.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPE.L tracks MSCI Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JPNL.L and 0.64% for IJPE.L.
Find the right allocation for JPNL.L and IJPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer