PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JPNL.L (Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR) and IJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Japan Equities funds - JPNL.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while IJPA.L tracks the MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPNL.L returned 9.84%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for IJPA.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPNL.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IJPA.L.

Performance

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPNL.L is traded in GBp, while IJPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJPA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPNL.L achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly lower than IJPA.L's 16.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JPNL.L having a 9.84% annualized return and IJPA.L not far ahead at 10.11%.

JPNL.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.10%
YTD
14.78%
6M
14.31%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
9.84%

IJPA.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.72%
YTD
16.11%
6M
16.00%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR		14.78%17.96%7.74%12.66%-5.98%1.37%8.23%15.36%-9.97%14.63%
IJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc		16.11%18.21%8.48%13.38%-6.19%1.11%11.60%13.95%-9.06%14.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JPNL.L and IJPA.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2012

0.75

The correlation between JPNL.L and IJPA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (5 years) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
JPNL.L
IJPA.L

Industrials

26.9%
25.2%

Technology

17.7%
19.8%

Financial Services

17.1%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
12.2%

Communication Services

7.8%
5.7%

Healthcare

5.5%
5.8%

Basic Materials

4.7%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.0%

Utilities

1.3%
1.2%

Energy

0.9%
0.9%

Industrials

JPNL.L
26.9%
IJPA.L
25.2%

Technology

JPNL.L
17.7%
IJPA.L
19.8%

Financial Services

JPNL.L
17.1%
IJPA.L
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JPNL.L
12.1%
IJPA.L
12.2%

Communication Services

JPNL.L
7.8%
IJPA.L
5.7%

Healthcare

JPNL.L
5.5%
IJPA.L
5.8%

Basic Materials

JPNL.L
4.7%
IJPA.L
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

JPNL.L
4.2%
IJPA.L
4.0%

Real Estate

JPNL.L
1.8%
IJPA.L
3.0%

Utilities

JPNL.L
1.3%
IJPA.L
1.2%

Energy

JPNL.L
0.9%
IJPA.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR

iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc

Often compared with JPNL.L:
JPNL.L vs. TPXG.LJPNL.L vs. JPXNJPNL.L vs. QQQJPNL.L vs. VOOJPNL.L vs. ^GSPCJPNL.L vs. VTJPNL.L vs. ^N225
Often compared with IJPA.L:
IJPA.L vs. IJPE.LIJPA.L vs. VJPN.LIJPA.L vs. IJPD.LIJPA.L vs. GLDIJPA.L vs. IAUIJPA.L vs. VJPB.LIJPA.L vs. FBT.L

Return for Risk

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
JPNL.L
JPNL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
IJPA.L
IJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

JPNL.LIJPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.93
1.80

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.69
2.62

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.16

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

10.35

-0.40

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPNL.L and IJPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

JPNL.LIJPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.80

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.62

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.61

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.54

+0.19

Drawdowns

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPNL.L drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, roughly equal to the maximum IJPA.L drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPNL.L and IJPA.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

JPNL.LIJPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-25.10%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-10.63%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.44%

-13.21%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-18.93%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-25.10%

-0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.08%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-6.35%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

3.25%

+0.12%

Volatility

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) is 3.61%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that JPNL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

JPNL.LIJPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

4.11%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

15.54%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

18.61%

-0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.30%

16.16%

+2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

16.58%

+1.26%

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPNL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IJPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPNL.L vs. IJPA.L - Dividend Comparison

JPNL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while IJPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR		0.62%0.71%0.74%1.23%1.83%1.37%1.14%1.98%1.84%1.43%1.96%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.90, JPNL.L and IJPA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPNL.L.

JPNL.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JPNL.L and 0.12% for IJPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPNL.L and IJPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer