PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPNL.L is traded in GBp, while IDFF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDFF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPNL.L achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than IDFF.L's 24.04% return. Over the past 10 years, JPNL.L has underperformed IDFF.L with an annualized return of 8.30%, while IDFF.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


JPNL.L

1D
-1.88%
1M
-4.36%
6M
5.39%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
8.30%

IDFF.L

1D
-2.46%
1M
-11.85%
6M
14.81%
YTD
24.04%
1Y
42.57%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
12.08%17.96%7.75%13.02%-5.78%0.85%10.24%13.26%-9.85%14.89%
IDFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
24.04%29.55%14.11%-3.61%-12.49%-8.34%22.21%12.81%-10.15%29.45%

Correlation

The correlation between JPNL.L and IDFF.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.36

The correlation between JPNL.L and IDFF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPNL.L
JPNL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IDFF.L
IDFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPNL.LIDFF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.95

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

10.11

-2.02

JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPNL.L and IDFF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPNL.L drawdown since its inception was -38.87%, smaller than the maximum IDFF.L drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPNL.L and IDFF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPNL.LIDFF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.87%

-51.16%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-14.35%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.44%

-19.80%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.80%

-32.24%

+13.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-39.79%

+14.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.34%

-14.35%

+8.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-12.97%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

4.20%

-0.73%

Volatility

JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) is 5.79%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L) has a volatility of 10.22%. This indicates that JPNL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPNL.LIDFF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

10.22%

-4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

21.04%

-5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.36%

23.79%

-5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

20.68%

-5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

20.13%

-4.29%

JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPNL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IDFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPNL.L vs. IDFF.L - Dividend Comparison

JPNL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than IDFF.L's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.13%1.46%1.85%1.85%2.07%1.39%1.13%1.67%2.04%1.50%1.92%2.29%
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
0.64%0.71%0.73%1.23%1.83%1.37%1.14%2.01%1.84%1.43%1.97%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPNL.L and IDFF.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPNL.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPNL.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.

JPNL.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while IDFF.L is Asia Pacific Equities. JPNL.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IDFF.L tracks MSCI All Country World Far East Ex Japan USD Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JPNL.L and 0.74% for IDFF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPNL.L and IDFF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer