JPMB vs. BREM
JPMB (JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF) and BREM (iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. JPMB is passively managed, while BREM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPMB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BREM.
Performance
JPMB vs. BREM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPMB achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than BREM's 3.77% return.
JPMB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 10.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- —
BREM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPMB vs. BREM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JPMB JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF | 1.95% | 1.41% |
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.77% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPMB and BREM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPMB vs. BREM — Risk / Return Rank
JPMB
BREM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JPMB vs. BREM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) and iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF (BREM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPMB | BREM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPMB vs. BREM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPMB drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, which is greater than BREM's maximum drawdown of -4.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPMB and BREM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPMB | BREM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.33% | -4.54% | -21.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.58% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -0.63% | -6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility
JPMB vs. BREM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPMB | BREM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.43% | 5.61% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 5.61% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.63% | 5.61% | +4.02% |
JPMB vs. BREM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BREM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPMB vs. BREM - Dividend Comparison
JPMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, more than BREM's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BREM iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF | 3.89% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPMB JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF | 5.78% | 6.71% | 6.32% | 5.99% | 4.94% | 4.29% | 4.29% | 4.51% | 4.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPMB and BREM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BREM.
JPMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.78%, compared with 3.89% for BREM.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JPMB and 0.50% for BREM.
Find the right allocation for JPMB and BREM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer