JPGL.L vs. VDST.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

JPGL.L (JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc) and VDST.L (Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - JPGL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VDST.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Short Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPGL.L returned 9.69%/yr vs 3.44%/yr for VDST.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPGL.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VDST.L.

Performance

JPGL.L vs. VDST.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPGL.L achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than VDST.L's 1.84% return.

JPGL.L

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.02%
• 6M: 9.52%
• YTD: 11.94%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: —

VDST.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 1.70%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 1Y: 3.89%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPGL.L vs. VDST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JPGL.L JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc	11.94%	18.24%	10.32%	13.28%	-10.20%	23.30%	11.03%
VDST.L Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	1.84%	4.27%	5.24%	4.98%	0.97%	-0.00%	0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between JPGL.L and VDST.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020	0.04

Return for Risk

JPGL.L vs. VDST.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPGL.L

JPGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
JPGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
JPGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
JPGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
JPGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
JPGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

VDST.L

VDST.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
VDST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VDST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
VDST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
VDST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
VDST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPGL.L vs. VDST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPGL.L	VDST.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	9.27	-7.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	21.96	-18.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	5.06	-3.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	37.89	-34.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.44	239.52	-227.08

JPGL.L vs. VDST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPGL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the VDST.L Sharpe Ratio of 9.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPGL.L and VDST.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPGL.L vs. VDST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPGL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.87%, which is greater than VDST.L's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPGL.L and VDST.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPGL.L	VDST.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.87%	-0.37%	-35.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.32%	-0.10%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.45%	-0.14%	-12.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.04%	-0.35%	-20.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	0.00%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-0.03%	-4.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	0.02%	+1.70%

Volatility

JPGL.L vs. VDST.L - Volatility Comparison

JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that JPGL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPGL.L	VDST.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	0.10%	+2.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.85%	0.32%	+7.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.98%	0.42%	+9.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.44%	0.47%	+12.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	0.44%	+15.59%

JPGL.L vs. VDST.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPGL.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VDST.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JPGL.L vs. VDST.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPGL.L nor VDST.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPGL.L and VDST.L in my portfolio?

JPGL.L and VDST.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JPGL.L or VDST.L?

On fees, VDST.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPGL.L or VDST.L?

VDST.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JPGL.L.

What is the main difference between JPGL.L and VDST.L?

JPGL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VDST.L is Government Bonds. JPGL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VDST.L tracks Bloomberg Short Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JPGL.L and 0.05% for VDST.L.