PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JPGL.L
JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc
5.05%18.22%10.35%13.26%-10.20%23.30%6.18%5.88%
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
10.34%43.13%14.48%18.38%-16.29%5.29%7.16%6.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPGL.L achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than EMVL.L's 10.34% return.


JPGL.L

1D
2.09%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
5.05%
6M
9.02%
1Y
19.42%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*

EMVL.L

1D
-1.63%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
10.34%
6M
20.32%
1Y
51.73%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPGL.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EMVL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPGL.L
JPGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JPGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

EMVL.L
EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPGL.LEMVL.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

2.52

-1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

3.07

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.45

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

5.47

-3.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.12

19.73

-9.61

JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPGL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPGL.L and EMVL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPGL.LEMVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.52

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.57

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.63

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between JPGL.L and EMVL.L is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPGL.L nor EMVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPGL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.87%, roughly equal to the maximum EMVL.L drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPGL.L and EMVL.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JPGL.LEMVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.87%

-34.95%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-11.65%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-34.95%

+13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.99%

-10.03%

+6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-10.19%

+5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.23%

-1.31%

Volatility

JPGL.L vs. EMVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) is 4.31%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that JPGL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JPGL.LEMVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

7.93%

-3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

15.45%

-8.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

20.32%

-7.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

19.49%

-6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

22.02%

-5.73%