JPGL.L vs. BBRT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L).
JPGL.L and BBRT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JPGL.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 9, 2019. BBRT.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Apr 25, 2019. Both JPGL.L and BBRT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
JPGL.L vs. BBRT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JPGL.L vs. BBRT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPGL.L JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc | 5.05% | 18.22% | 10.35% | 13.26% | -10.20% | 23.30% | 6.18% | 5.88% |
BBRT.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.27% | 6.61% | 0.51% | 3.18% | -12.92% | -2.10% | 7.65% | 2.97% |
Different Trading Currencies
JPGL.L is traded in USD, while BBRT.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BBRT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPGL.L achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly higher than BBRT.L's -0.22% return.
JPGL.L
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 5.05%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 19.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- —
BBRT.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JPGL.L vs. BBRT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPGL.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BBRT.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
JPGL.L vs. BBRT.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPGL.L
BBRT.L
JPGL.L vs. BBRT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPGL.L | BBRT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 0.51 | +0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 0.78 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.09 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 0.95 | +1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.12 | 2.34 | +7.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPGL.L | BBRT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 0.51 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | -0.05 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.12 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between JPGL.L and BBRT.L is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
JPGL.L vs. BBRT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPGL.L nor BBRT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
JPGL.L vs. BBRT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPGL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.87%, which is greater than BBRT.L's maximum drawdown of -20.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPGL.L and BBRT.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPGL.L | BBRT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.87% | -24.57% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -7.56% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.04% | -16.20% | -4.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -19.09% | +15.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -16.73% | +12.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 4.37% | -2.45% |
Volatility
JPGL.L vs. BBRT.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBRT.L) at 2.05%. This indicates that JPGL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBRT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JPGL.L | BBRT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 2.05% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 3.63% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.20% | 5.70% | +7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 7.26% | +6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 7.52% | +8.77% |