JPEF vs. NRSH
JPEF (JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. JPEF is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, JPEF returned 19.43% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPEF charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
JPEF vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPEF achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.
JPEF
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 19.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRSH
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 47.92%
- 6M
- 46.01%
- 1Y
- 58.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPEF vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPEF JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF | 7.80% | 12.07% | 28.19% | 4.43% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 47.92% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPEF and NRSH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between JPEF and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPEF vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPEF
NRSH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
JPEF
NRSH
Financial Services
JPEF
NRSH
-
Communication Services
JPEF
NRSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
JPEF
NRSH
-
Industrials
JPEF
NRSH
Healthcare
JPEF
NRSH
-
Energy
JPEF
NRSH
Utilities
JPEF
NRSH
-
Real Estate
JPEF
NRSH
Basic Materials
JPEF
NRSH
-
Consumer Defensive
JPEF
NRSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPEF vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
JPEF
NRSH
JPEF vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF (JPEF) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPEF | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 2.42 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 3.11 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 5.40 | -3.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | 16.86 | -6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPEF | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.42 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 1.11 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
JPEF vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPEF drawdown since its inception was -18.09%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPEF and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPEF | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.09% | -24.01% | +5.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -10.94% | +2.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | 0.00% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -5.62% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.50% | -1.68% |
Volatility
JPEF vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF (JPEF) is 3.01%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that JPEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPEF | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 9.21% | -6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 20.27% | -11.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.38% | 24.44% | -13.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 21.54% | -6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 21.54% | -6.52% |
JPEF vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPEF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPEF vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
JPEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPEF JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF | 0.65% | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.39% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPEF and NRSH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to JPEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPEF dropped -18.09% vs NRSH's -24.01%.
On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 19.43% for JPEF. On fees, JPEF is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JPEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 19.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPEF is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
JPEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JPEF and 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPEF and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer