PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (JPEE.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPEE.L is traded in EUR, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPEE.L achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 10.97% return.


JPEE.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.79%
YTD
2.94%
6M
2.68%
1Y
9.56%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*

SWDA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.83%
YTD
10.97%
6M
11.38%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPEE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.94%0.68%12.62%6.56%-13.43%5.84%-3.49%18.14%-0.92%0.44%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.06%6.76%26.95%20.08%-13.06%31.68%6.15%30.86%-4.97%6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JPEE.L and SWDA.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPEE.L
JPEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JPEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (JPEE.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPEE.LSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.63

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

14.82

-5.91

JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPEE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPEE.L and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPEE.LSWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.18

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.92

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.85

-0.55

Drawdowns

JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPEE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.89%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPEE.L and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPEE.LSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.89%

-33.00%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-6.53%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.74%

-20.55%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.87%

-20.55%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-4.31%

-3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.60%

-0.53%

Volatility

JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (JPEE.L) is 1.27%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that JPEE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPEE.LSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

2.22%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

7.56%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.88%

10.88%

-5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

14.07%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.73%

15.15%

-5.42%

JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPEE.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPEE.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPEE.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPEE.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPEE.L.

JPEE.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. JPEE.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JPEE.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPEE.L and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer