JPEA.L vs. EMAU.L
JPEA.L (iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EMAU.L (L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - JPEA.L tracks the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index while EMAU.L tracks the J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPEA.L returned 8.62%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for EMAU.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPEA.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EMAU.L.
Performance
JPEA.L vs. EMAU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPEA.L achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than EMAU.L's 1.29% return.
JPEA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
EMAU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPEA.L vs. EMAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPEA.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.69% | 13.66% | 5.74% | 10.95% | -18.56% | -1.26% |
EMAU.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.29% | 8.06% | 5.68% | 6.84% | -11.34% | -1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPEA.L and EMAU.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between JPEA.L and EMAU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPEA.L vs. EMAU.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPEA.L
EMAU.L
JPEA.L vs. EMAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPEA.L | EMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.18 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 9.66 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPEA.L vs. EMAU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPEA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than EMAU.L's maximum drawdown of -19.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPEA.L and EMAU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPEA.L | EMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.64% | -19.62% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -2.55% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.35% | -3.01% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.27% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -5.68% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.57% | +0.46% |
Volatility
JPEA.L vs. EMAU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAU.L) at 0.85%. This indicates that JPEA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPEA.L | EMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 0.85% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.72% | 2.81% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.70% | 3.39% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 5.58% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.19% | 5.58% | +4.61% |
JPEA.L vs. EMAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPEA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EMAU.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPEA.L vs. EMAU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPEA.L nor EMAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JPEA.L and EMAU.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMAU.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMAU.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPEA.L.
JPEA.L tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index, while EMAU.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for JPEA.L and 0.35% for EMAU.L.
Find the right allocation for JPEA.L and EMAU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer