JPCT.L vs. JEPG.L
JPCT.L (JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and JEPG.L (JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - JPCT.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive J.P. Morgan Asset Management Carbon Transition Global Equity CTB Index, while JEPG.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by JPMorgan. JPCT.L is passively managed, while JEPG.L is actively managed. Over the past year, JPCT.L returned 16.45% vs 4.62% for JEPG.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPCT.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPG.L.
Performance
JPCT.L vs. JEPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPCT.L achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than JEPG.L's 0.47% return.
JPCT.L
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 16.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
JEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPCT.L vs. JEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPCT.L JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.18% | 19.79% | 17.53% | 5.35% |
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 0.47% | 12.42% | 7.80% | 2.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPCT.L and JEPG.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPCT.L vs. JEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPCT.L
JEPG.L
JPCT.L vs. JEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPCT.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPCT.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.09 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 0.53 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 1.17 | +5.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPCT.L vs. JEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPCT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, which is greater than JEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -8.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPCT.L and JEPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPCT.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.59% | -8.74% | -17.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.25% | -8.74% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -5.02% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -1.91% | -3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 3.94% | -1.51% |
Volatility
JPCT.L vs. JEPG.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPCT.L) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JEPG.L) at 2.23%. This indicates that JPCT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPCT.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.23% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 7.10% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 9.17% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 10.90% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 10.90% | +4.43% |
JPCT.L vs. JEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPCT.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPCT.L vs. JEPG.L - Dividend Comparison
JPCT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 8.14% | 7.86% | 6.50% |
JPCT.L JPM Carbon Transition Global Equity (CTB) UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPCT.L and JEPG.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPCT.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPCT.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPG.L.
JPCT.L is categorized as Global Equities, while JEPG.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JPCT.L and 0.35% for JEPG.L.
Find the right allocation for JPCT.L and JEPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer