PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.L) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPBM.L is traded in GBP, while EMDG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMDG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPBM.L achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than EMDG.L's 1.60% return.


JPBM.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.72%
YTD
2.24%
6M
1.65%
1Y
13.68%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*

EMDG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
1.49%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.41%
1Y
7.92%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JPBM.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
2.24%6.76%4.67%4.36%-5.01%0.35%-0.26%
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
1.60%2.35%10.43%1.99%0.28%0.96%-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between JPBM.L and EMDG.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.76

The correlation between JPBM.L and EMDG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPBM.L
JPBM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JPBM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPBM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPBM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JPBM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPBM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDG.L
EMDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.L) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPBM.LEMDG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.10

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.23

6.03

+3.20

JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPBM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPBM.L and EMDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPBM.LEMDG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.36

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.50

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.37

+0.09

Drawdowns

JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPBM.L drawdown since its inception was -19.74%, which is greater than EMDG.L's maximum drawdown of -12.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPBM.L and EMDG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPBM.LEMDG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.74%

-12.32%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-3.76%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.37%

-7.93%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.03%

-12.32%

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-4.33%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.31%

+0.12%

Volatility

JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.L) is 1.62%, while L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) has a volatility of 1.78%. This indicates that JPBM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPBM.LEMDG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.78%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

4.08%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.15%

5.81%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.67%

7.86%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.21%

7.82%

+2.39%

JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPBM.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EMDG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPBM.L vs. EMDG.L - Dividend Comparison

JPBM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than EMDG.L's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
5.33%5.95%5.95%4.65%2.91%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPBM.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
6.86%7.14%6.80%6.27%6.59%5.57%5.57%5.84%5.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPBM.L and EMDG.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMDG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMDG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JPBM.L.

Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JPBM.L and 0.25% for EMDG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPBM.L and EMDG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer