PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOMMX vs. CEMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOMMX vs. CEMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JOHCM Emerging Markets Small Mid Cap Equity Fund (JOMMX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOMMX achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly lower than CEMFX's 18.98% return. Over the past 10 years, JOMMX has underperformed CEMFX with an annualized return of 8.46%, while CEMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.21% annualized return.


JOMMX

1D
-1.17%
1M
-6.07%
6M
9.01%
YTD
13.47%
1Y
20.21%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
8.46%

CEMFX

1D
-1.34%
1M
-5.21%
6M
11.56%
YTD
18.98%
1Y
36.75%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOMMX vs. CEMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JOMMX
JOHCM Emerging Markets Small Mid Cap Equity Fund
13.47%23.88%4.29%24.91%-21.36%7.22%23.57%18.25%-20.02%28.46%
CEMFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund
18.98%31.39%9.51%26.45%-16.15%6.74%8.70%19.75%-16.90%29.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JOMMX and CEMFX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014

0.79

The correlation between JOMMX and CEMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOMMX vs. CEMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOMMX
JOMMX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
JOMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JOMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMFX
CEMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CEMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOMMX vs. CEMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JOHCM Emerging Markets Small Mid Cap Equity Fund (JOMMX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JOMMXCEMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

3.01

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.73

9.45

-4.72

JOMMX vs. CEMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOMMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the CEMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOMMX and CEMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JOMMX vs. CEMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOMMX drawdown since its inception was -42.63%, which is greater than CEMFX's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOMMX and CEMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOMMXCEMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.63%

-39.30%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.61%

-12.41%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.97%

-13.27%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.52%

-26.73%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.63%

-39.30%

-3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.42%

-7.75%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.30%

-9.56%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

3.95%

+0.70%

Volatility

JOMMX vs. CEMFX - Volatility Comparison

JOHCM Emerging Markets Small Mid Cap Equity Fund (JOMMX) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) at 5.38%. This indicates that JOMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOMMXCEMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

5.38%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

15.11%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.82%

17.58%

+8.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

14.84%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

15.20%

+3.08%

JOMMX vs. CEMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOMMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JOMMX vs. CEMFX - Dividend Comparison

JOMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, more than CEMFX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEMFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund
2.11%1.72%3.31%4.68%1.26%2.62%2.13%4.16%2.26%3.59%3.65%4.60%
JOMMX
JOHCM Emerging Markets Small Mid Cap Equity Fund
11.27%12.79%9.45%0.94%1.10%20.78%0.45%0.68%0.53%1.05%2.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JOMMX and CEMFX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JOMMX has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to CEMFX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOMMX dropped -42.63% vs CEMFX's -39.30%.

CEMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOMMX and CEMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer