PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOEMX vs. HLFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOEMX vs. HLFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (JOEMX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOEMX achieves a 16.97% return, which is significantly higher than HLFMX's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, JOEMX has outperformed HLFMX with an annualized return of 8.73%, while HLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.32% annualized return.


JOEMX

1D
0.98%
1M
-0.29%
6M
7.85%
YTD
16.97%
1Y
36.29%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
8.73%
ALL TIME*
5.86%

HLFMX

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.96%
6M
-2.77%
YTD
5.94%
1Y
11.62%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
4.32%
ALL TIME*
1.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JOEMX vs. HLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JOEMX
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
16.97%36.38%6.03%7.18%-15.74%1.29%16.46%14.86%-14.73%34.68%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
5.94%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-15.45%25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between JOEMX and HLFMX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2012

0.55

The correlation between JOEMX and HLFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOEMX vs. HLFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JOEMX
JOEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JOEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JOEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JOEMX vs. HLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (JOEMX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JOEMXHLFMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.09

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

2.68

+5.13

JOEMX vs. HLFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the HLFMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOEMX and HLFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JOEMX vs. HLFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.23%, smaller than the maximum HLFMX drawdown of -63.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOEMX and HLFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOEMXHLFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.23%

-63.95%

+25.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.66%

-11.09%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-11.79%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

-28.37%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.23%

-46.61%

+8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-3.76%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-19.13%

+7.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

4.49%

+0.12%

Volatility

JOEMX vs. HLFMX - Volatility Comparison

JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (JOEMX) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) at 3.55%. This indicates that JOEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOEMXHLFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

3.55%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.24%

11.02%

+7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.82%

12.40%

+8.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

10.67%

+6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

11.95%

+5.39%

JOEMX vs. HLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOEMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than HLFMX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JOEMX vs. HLFMX - Dividend Comparison

JOEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than HLFMX's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.36%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%
JOEMX
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
3.44%4.03%1.22%1.76%2.08%3.67%1.13%3.85%4.55%0.63%0.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JOEMX and HLFMX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JOEMX has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to HLFMX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOEMX dropped -38.23% vs HLFMX's -63.95%.

JOEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOEMX and HLFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer