JNOSX vs. LMGNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Overseas Fund (JNOSX) and ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX).
JNOSX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on May 2, 1994. LMGNX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 17, 1995.
Performance
JNOSX vs. LMGNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNOSX vs. LMGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNOSX Janus Henderson Overseas Fund | 0.14% | 28.76% | 5.89% | 10.94% | -8.71% | 13.11% | 16.71% | 28.21% | -15.30% | 31.33% |
LMGNX ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I | -4.06% | 23.05% | 7.48% | 14.30% | -21.16% | 3.99% | 24.92% | 31.43% | -9.37% | 36.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNOSX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than LMGNX's -4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, JNOSX has outperformed LMGNX with an annualized return of 10.47%, while LMGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.33% annualized return.
JNOSX
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 22.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
LMGNX
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -8.09%
- YTD
- -4.06%
- 6M
- -3.93%
- 1Y
- 12.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNOSX vs. LMGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNOSX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LMGNX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNOSX vs. LMGNX — Risk / Return Rank
JNOSX
LMGNX
JNOSX vs. LMGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Overseas Fund (JNOSX) and ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNOSX | LMGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.68 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.04 | +0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.14 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 0.88 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 3.48 | +3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNOSX | LMGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.68 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.22 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.54 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.30 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNOSX and LMGNX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JNOSX vs. LMGNX - Dividend Comparison
JNOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than LMGNX's 7.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNOSX Janus Henderson Overseas Fund | 1.28% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.39% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 0.88% | 2.77% | 1.15% | 1.86% | 1.32% | 4.63% |
LMGNX ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I | 7.64% | 7.33% | 1.38% | 1.28% | 0.81% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.31% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JNOSX vs. LMGNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNOSX drawdown since its inception was -72.45%, roughly equal to the maximum LMGNX drawdown of -71.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNOSX and LMGNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNOSX | LMGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.45% | -71.13% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.15% | -13.62% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.89% | -34.96% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.68% | -34.96% | -1.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.36% | -10.45% | +2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.09% | -15.55% | -11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.45% | -0.55% |
Volatility
JNOSX vs. LMGNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Overseas Fund (JNOSX) is 6.63%, while ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that JNOSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNOSX | LMGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 9.24% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 13.24% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.01% | 18.87% | -3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 17.46% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 17.21% | -0.11% |