PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNKE.L vs. SHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNKE.L vs. SHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (JNKE.L) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JNKE.L is traded in EUR, while SHY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SHY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNKE.L achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than SHY's 2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, JNKE.L has outperformed SHY with an annualized return of 3.10%, while SHY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.49% annualized return.


JNKE.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.57%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
3.10%

SHY

1D
0.59%
1M
1.73%
YTD
2.26%
6M
1.72%
1Y
2.42%
3Y*
1.44%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
1.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNKE.L vs. SHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNKE.L
SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
1.14%5.01%5.84%11.68%-10.56%2.88%1.85%10.51%-4.34%4.97%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
2.26%-7.50%10.78%1.04%2.08%6.71%-5.46%5.72%6.23%-12.06%

Correlation

The correlation between JNKE.L and SHY is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2012

-0.05

The correlation between JNKE.L and SHY shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (5 years) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNKE.L vs. SHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNKE.L
JNKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JNKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
JNKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SHY
SHY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNKE.L vs. SHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (JNKE.L) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNKE.LSHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.08

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

0.61

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

1.52

+2.32

JNKE.L vs. SHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNKE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is comparable to the SHY Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNKE.L and SHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNKE.LSHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.39

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.21

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.29

+0.38

Drawdowns

JNKE.L vs. SHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNKE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, which is greater than SHY's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNKE.L and SHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNKE.LSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.52%

-18.74%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-3.98%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.12%

-10.84%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.25%

-12.65%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.52%

-16.89%

-8.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-6.28%

+6.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-7.12%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

1.59%

-0.73%

Volatility

JNKE.L vs. SHY - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (JNKE.L) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) at 1.05%. This indicates that JNKE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNKE.LSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.05%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

4.11%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.53%

5.83%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

7.28%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

7.16%

-0.20%

JNKE.L vs. SHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNKE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNKE.L vs. SHY - Dividend Comparison

JNKE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than SHY's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNKE.L
SPDR Bloomberg Euro High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
5.35%5.48%5.85%4.95%3.47%2.91%3.14%3.08%2.87%3.57%3.58%3.92%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.69%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNKE.L and SHY have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNKE.L.

JNKE.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while SHY is Government Bonds. JNKE.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while SHY tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNKE.L and 0.15% for SHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNKE.L and SHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer