JNGTX vs. FIKHX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX).

JNGTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998. FIKHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.

Performance

JNGTX vs. FIKHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JNGTX vs. FIKHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D	-7.02%	25.00%	32.34%	55.33%	-37.63%	17.53%	51.18%	45.15%	-10.21%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	0.00%	24.77%	35.52%	59.89%	-35.93%	27.74%	64.56%	51.18%	-17.39%

Returns By Period

JNGTX

• 1D: 4.03%
• 1M: -7.48%
• YTD: -7.02%
• 6M: -6.55%
• 1Y: 27.77%
• 3Y*: 24.99%
• 5Y*: 10.78%
• 10Y*: 20.41%

FIKHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNGTX vs. FIKHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNGTX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.

JNGTX

Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D

FIKHX

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

JNGTX vs. FIKHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNGTX

JNGTX Risk / Return Rank: 65
JNGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
JNGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
JNGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
JNGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
JNGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNGTX vs. FIKHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JNGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.10	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JNGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between JNGTX and FIKHX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

JNGTX vs. FIKHX - Dividend Comparison

JNGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.43%, more than FIKHX's 9.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D	14.43%	13.42%	11.65%	0.77%	0.00%	15.86%	8.99%	8.55%	6.61%	7.47%	4.83%	7.75%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	9.85%	9.85%	7.33%	3.86%	3.32%	11.52%	7.42%	2.64%	22.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	JNGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.54%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.47%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JNGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.51%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.29%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.40%	—	—