JNEU vs. PQJA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JNEU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jun ETF) and PQJA (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JNEU returned 22.44% vs 22.65% for PQJA. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JNEU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQJA.

Performance

JNEU vs. PQJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jun ETF (JNEU) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNEU achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than PQJA's 8.72% return.

JNEU

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 5.25%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 9.27%
• 1Y: 22.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQJA

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 22.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNEU vs. PQJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JNEU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jun ETF	10.10%	11.52%
PQJA PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January	8.72%	16.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JNEU and PQJA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.92

The correlation between JNEU and PQJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JNEU vs. PQJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNEU

JNEU Risk / Return Rank: 65
JNEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
JNEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
JNEU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JNEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
JNEU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

PQJA

PQJA Risk / Return Rank: 82
PQJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PQJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PQJA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PQJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PQJA Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNEU vs. PQJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jun ETF (JNEU) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JNEU	PQJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.77	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	3.93	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.55	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	3.36	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.13	16.33	-4.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JNEU vs. PQJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNEU Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the PQJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNEU and PQJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JNEU	PQJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	2.77	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	1.39	-0.08

Drawdowns

JNEU vs. PQJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNEU drawdown since its inception was -13.53%, smaller than the maximum PQJA drawdown of -14.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNEU and PQJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JNEU	PQJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.53%	-14.72%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.05%	-6.77%	-1.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.09%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-1.65%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	1.39%	+0.46%

Volatility

JNEU vs. PQJA - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jun ETF (JNEU) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA) at 1.20%. This indicates that JNEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JNEU	PQJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	1.20%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.07%	6.66%	+1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	8.24%	+2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.97%	13.42%	-1.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.97%	13.42%	-1.45%

JNEU vs. PQJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNEU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PQJA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

JNEU vs. PQJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither JNEU nor PQJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JNEU and PQJA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, JNEU and PQJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JNEU or PQJA?

JNEU has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to PQJA (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNEU dropped -13.53% vs PQJA's -14.72%.

Which ETF is better, JNEU or PQJA?

On 1-year performance, PQJA leads with 22.65% vs 22.44% for JNEU. On fees, PQJA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PQJA has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JNEU or PQJA?

Over the 1-year period, PQJA has performed better with a 22.65% return vs 22.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JNEU or PQJA?

PQJA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JNEU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JNEU or PQJA?

JNEU and PQJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JNEU and PQJA?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JNEU and 0.50% for PQJA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.