PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNEMX vs. EPDPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNEMX vs. EPDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 (JNEMX) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNEMX achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than EPDPX's 13.86% return. Over the past 10 years, JNEMX has underperformed EPDPX with an annualized return of 9.03%, while EPDPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.


JNEMX

1D
0.76%
1M
4.41%
YTD
8.64%
6M
9.89%
1Y
15.56%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
9.03%

EPDPX

1D
0.91%
1M
2.64%
YTD
13.86%
6M
16.83%
1Y
44.98%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNEMX vs. EPDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNEMX
JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6
8.64%26.14%1.62%18.11%-19.44%11.92%13.42%27.95%-17.69%30.04%
EPDPX
EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A
13.86%61.93%0.72%7.46%1.27%7.78%8.83%13.05%-11.02%15.53%

Correlation

The correlation between JNEMX and EPDPX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2014

0.75

The correlation between JNEMX and EPDPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNEMX vs. EPDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNEMX
JNEMX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
JNEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
JNEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

EPDPX
EPDPX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EPDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EPDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNEMX vs. EPDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 (JNEMX) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNEMXEPDPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.59

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

4.11

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

15.41

-10.97

JNEMX vs. EPDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNEMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the EPDPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNEMX and EPDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNEMXEPDPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

3.27

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.99

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.68

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.48

-0.07

Drawdowns

JNEMX vs. EPDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNEMX drawdown since its inception was -34.13%, smaller than the maximum EPDPX drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNEMX and EPDPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNEMXEPDPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.13%

-39.21%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-10.96%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

-13.15%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.05%

-21.06%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.13%

-33.34%

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-2.59%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-11.19%

+2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.92%

+0.36%

Volatility

JNEMX vs. EPDPX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 (JNEMX) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX) at 4.19%. This indicates that JNEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNEMXEPDPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

4.19%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

11.58%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

13.87%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

14.08%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

14.89%

+2.35%

JNEMX vs. EPDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNEMX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EPDPX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNEMX vs. EPDPX - Dividend Comparison

JNEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than EPDPX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPDPX
EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A
5.88%6.55%3.82%3.08%2.56%2.07%1.70%2.43%2.66%2.69%2.24%3.58%
JNEMX
JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6
6.17%6.71%3.27%2.40%2.88%6.89%1.30%3.65%3.93%1.83%2.03%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNEMX and EPDPX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNEMX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to EPDPX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNEMX dropped -34.13% vs EPDPX's -39.21%.

EPDPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNEMX and EPDPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer