JMST vs. SPTU
JMST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. JMST is actively managed, while SPTU is passively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMST charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
JMST vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMST achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than SPTU's 1.48% return.
JMST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- 2.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMST vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF | 0.99% | 0.67% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMST and SPTU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMST vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
JMST
SPTU
JMST vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMST | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.57 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 64.44 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMST | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.89 | 11.82 | -9.93 |
Drawdowns
JMST vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMST drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMST and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMST | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -0.04% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -0.00% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | — | — |
Volatility
JMST vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMST | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59% | 0.32% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.83% | 0.32% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.14% | 0.32% | +0.82% |
JMST vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JMST vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
JMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.65% | 2.84% | 3.32% | 3.09% | 1.10% | 0.27% | 0.87% | 1.63% | 0.28% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMST and SPTU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JMST.
JMST has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMST and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for JMST and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer