PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSIX vs. SEEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSIX vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSIX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than SEEGX's 7.85% return. Over the past 10 years, JMSIX has underperformed SEEGX with an annualized return of 3.98%, while SEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.86% annualized return.


JMSIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.85%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
3.98%

SEEGX

1D
0.66%
1M
6.70%
YTD
7.85%
6M
6.50%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
19.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSIX vs. SEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
1.35%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%6.00%
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
7.85%14.08%35.14%34.62%-25.40%18.17%56.02%39.13%0.50%38.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSIX and SEEGX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSIX vs. SEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SEEGX
SEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSIX vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSIXSEEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.25

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

1.31

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

3.74

+11.13

JMSIX vs. SEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the SEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSIX and SEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSIXSEEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.42

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.68

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.92

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.57

+0.22

Drawdowns

JMSIX vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum SEEGX drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSIX and SEEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIXSEEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-62.09%

+43.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-16.82%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.31%

-21.50%

+19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.39%

-31.23%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.40%

-31.85%

+13.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-16.90%

+14.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

5.89%

-5.50%

Volatility

JMSIX vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) is 0.82%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that JMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSIXSEEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

3.87%

-3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

11.22%

-9.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

15.60%

-13.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

20.19%

-16.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.87%

21.60%

-17.73%

JMSIX vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMSIX vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison

JMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than SEEGX's 10.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
6.02%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%0.00%
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
10.61%11.44%2.00%0.12%3.42%14.92%5.27%12.85%15.97%14.79%9.88%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMSIX and SEEGX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEEGX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to JMSIX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSIX dropped -18.40% vs SEEGX's -62.09%.

JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSIX and SEEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer