JMSIX vs. JLGMX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX).
JMSIX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Jun 1, 2014. JLGMX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010.
Performance
JMSIX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JMSIX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | -0.17% | 7.68% | 7.78% | 6.14% | -8.24% | 3.59% | 3.07% | 11.82% | 1.03% | 6.00% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | -8.48% | 14.38% | 35.40% | 34.95% | -25.20% | 18.48% | 56.39% | 39.47% | 0.74% | 38.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMSIX achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's -8.48% return. Over the past 10 years, JMSIX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 3.95%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.
JMSIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
JLGMX
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 6M
- -10.35%
- 1Y
- 12.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JMSIX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMSIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JMSIX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank
JMSIX
JLGMX
JMSIX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMSIX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 0.64 | +1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.57 | 1.05 | +2.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.15 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 0.81 | +2.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.07 | 2.47 | +10.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMSIX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 0.64 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.53 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 0.85 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.80 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between JMSIX and JLGMX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JMSIX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison
JMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than JLGMX's 12.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | 5.52% | 5.95% | 5.78% | 4.43% | 4.78% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 5.10% | 5.43% | 5.42% | 0.46% | 0.00% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 12.06% | 11.04% | 2.12% | 0.31% | 3.49% | 14.25% | 5.14% | 12.65% | 15.59% | 14.44% | 9.71% | 4.43% |
Drawdowns
JMSIX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum JLGMX drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSIX and JLGMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMSIX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | -31.82% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.64% | -16.73% | +15.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.39% | -31.13% | +19.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.40% | -31.82% | +13.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -13.83% | +12.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -5.82% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 5.51% | -5.08% |
Volatility
JMSIX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) is 0.77%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that JMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JMSIX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 6.48% | -5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.67% | 12.54% | -10.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 21.14% | -18.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.69% | 20.25% | -16.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.85% | 21.54% | -17.69% |