PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSIX vs. BWDTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSIX vs. BWDTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSIX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than BWDTX's 1.58% return.


JMSIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.85%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
3.98%

BWDTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.58%
6M
2.08%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSIX vs. BWDTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
1.35%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%6.00%
BWDTX
Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund
1.58%7.14%4.92%9.80%-3.16%2.32%4.66%7.94%-0.51%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSIX and BWDTX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2016

0.57

The correlation between JMSIX and BWDTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSIX vs. BWDTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BWDTX
BWDTX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BWDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BWDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSIX vs. BWDTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSIXBWDTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

2.42

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

6.19

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

31.32

-16.45

JMSIX vs. BWDTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is lower than the BWDTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSIX and BWDTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSIXBWDTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

4.78

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.93

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

1.80

-1.01

Drawdowns

JMSIX vs. BWDTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, which is greater than BWDTX's maximum drawdown of -10.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSIX and BWDTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIXBWDTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-10.06%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-1.00%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.31%

-2.21%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.39%

-6.35%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-0.68%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.20%

+0.19%

Volatility

JMSIX vs. BWDTX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX) at 0.43%. This indicates that JMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWDTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSIXBWDTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

0.43%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

1.03%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

1.29%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

2.21%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.87%

2.20%

+1.67%

JMSIX vs. BWDTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JMSIX and BWDTX have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

JMSIX vs. BWDTX - Dividend Comparison

JMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than BWDTX's 5.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BWDTX
Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund
5.65%5.70%4.13%5.51%3.80%3.20%3.18%3.47%4.18%2.90%1.35%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
6.02%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMSIX and BWDTX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMSIX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to BWDTX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSIX dropped -18.40% vs BWDTX's -10.06%.

BWDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSIX and BWDTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer