PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSIX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSIX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSIX achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, JMSIX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 3.97%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


JMSIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.85%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
3.97%

BND

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.91%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSIX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
1.23%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%6.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.52%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSIX and BND is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.51

The correlation between JMSIX and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSIX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSIX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMSIXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.21

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.65

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.54

4.81

+9.74

JMSIX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSIX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMSIX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSIX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-18.58%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-2.68%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.31%

-5.92%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.39%

-17.91%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.40%

-18.58%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-2.12%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-3.06%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.92%

-0.53%

Volatility

JMSIX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) is 0.79%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that JMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSIXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

1.28%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

2.74%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52%

3.75%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

6.03%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.87%

5.53%

-1.66%

JMSIX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMSIX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

JMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than BND's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
6.03%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMSIX and BND have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BND has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to JMSIX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSIX dropped -18.40% vs BND's -18.58%.

JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSIX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer