PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JMRE.L is traded in GBp, while MVEA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MVEA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMRE.L achieves a 31.45% return, which is significantly higher than MVEA.L's 1.70% return.


JMRE.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
31.45%
6M
33.94%
1Y
62.35%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*

MVEA.L

1D
0.24%
1M
2.96%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.52%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JMRE.L
JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)
31.45%25.64%8.21%2.02%-12.02%-1.26%16.30%
MVEA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF
1.70%-2.72%14.94%6.35%-1.55%26.04%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between JMRE.L and MVEA.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between JMRE.L and MVEA.L has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMRE.L
MVEA.L

Technology

37.5%
30.2%

Financial Services

20.3%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
6.6%

Communication Services

7.3%
6.2%

Industrials

6.8%
5.7%

Basic Materials

5.9%
3.2%

Energy

4.5%
3.4%

Healthcare

2.7%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
9.3%

Utilities

1.6%
4.7%

Real Estate

0.4%
3.1%

Technology

JMRE.L
37.5%
MVEA.L
30.2%

Financial Services

JMRE.L
20.3%
MVEA.L
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JMRE.L
10.7%
MVEA.L
6.6%

Communication Services

JMRE.L
7.3%
MVEA.L
6.2%

Industrials

JMRE.L
6.8%
MVEA.L
5.7%

Basic Materials

JMRE.L
5.9%
MVEA.L
3.2%

Energy

JMRE.L
4.5%
MVEA.L
3.4%

Healthcare

JMRE.L
2.7%
MVEA.L
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

JMRE.L
2.5%
MVEA.L
9.3%

Utilities

JMRE.L
1.6%
MVEA.L
4.7%

Real Estate

JMRE.L
0.4%
MVEA.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMRE.L
JMRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JMRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JMRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEA.L
MVEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MVEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMRE.LMVEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.08

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.90

0.70

+5.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.57

1.73

+18.84

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is higher than the MVEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMRE.L and MVEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMRE.LMVEA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70

0.44

+3.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.60

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.62

-0.37

Drawdowns

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMRE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.64%, which is greater than MVEA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMRE.L and MVEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMRE.LMVEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.64%

-14.36%

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-5.43%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.91%

-14.36%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-14.36%

-11.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-6.98%

+6.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-4.43%

-10.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.19%

+0.83%

Volatility

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) at 2.88%. This indicates that JMRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMRE.LMVEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

2.88%

+4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

6.11%

+8.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

8.61%

+8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

11.61%

+15.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.15%

11.94%

+14.21%

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMRE.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MVEA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMRE.L vs. MVEA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JMRE.L nor MVEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JMRE.L and MVEA.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVEA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVEA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JMRE.L.

JMRE.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MVEA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. JMRE.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while MVEA.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMRE.L and 0.20% for MVEA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMRE.L and MVEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer