JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L
JMRE.L (JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and JEPQ.L (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - JMRE.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while JEPQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. JMRE.L is passively managed, while JEPQ.L is actively managed. Over the past year, JMRE.L returned 62.35% vs 30.92% for JEPQ.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMRE.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.L.
Performance
JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JMRE.L is traded in GBp, while JEPQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JEPQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMRE.L achieves a 31.45% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ.L's 10.08% return.
JMRE.L
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 31.45%
- 6M
- 33.94%
- 1Y
- 62.35%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.L
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 30.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JMRE.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 31.45% | 25.64% | -1.27% |
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.08% | 6.60% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMRE.L and JEPQ.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between JMRE.L and JEPQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Financial Services
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Communication Services
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Industrials
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Basic Materials
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Energy
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Healthcare
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Consumer Defensive
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Utilities
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Real Estate
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
JMRE.L
JEPQ.L
JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMRE.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.47 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.90 | 5.53 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.57 | 19.73 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMRE.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 2.51 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.93 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMRE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.64%, which is greater than JEPQ.L's maximum drawdown of -22.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMRE.L and JEPQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMRE.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.64% | -22.11% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -5.57% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -4.78% | -9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 1.56% | +1.46% |
Volatility
JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that JMRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMRE.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 2.63% | +4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 8.92% | +5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 12.26% | +4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 16.04% | +10.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 16.04% | +10.11% |
JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMRE.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMRE.L vs. JEPQ.L - Dividend Comparison
JMRE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.11% | 10.06% | 0.74% |
JMRE.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMRE.L and JEPQ.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMRE.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMRE.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.L.
JMRE.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while JEPQ.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMRE.L and 0.35% for JEPQ.L.
Find the right allocation for JMRE.L and JEPQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer