JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L
JMRE.L (JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and FEMQ.L (Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from JPMorgan and Fidelity respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMRE.L returned 8.79%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for FEMQ.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMRE.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FEMQ.L.
Performance
JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JMRE.L is traded in GBp, while FEMQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FEMQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMRE.L achieves a 31.45% return, which is significantly lower than FEMQ.L's 37.29% return.
JMRE.L
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 31.45%
- 6M
- 33.94%
- 1Y
- 62.35%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
FEMQ.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 14.59%
- YTD
- 37.29%
- 6M
- 37.50%
- 1Y
- 61.42%
- 3Y*
- 24.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- —
JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMRE.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 31.45% | 25.64% | 8.21% | 2.02% | -12.02% | -1.26% | 16.34% | 15.61% | -24.67% |
FEMQ.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF | 37.29% | 20.96% | 6.49% | 9.64% | -15.02% | 7.70% | 9.31% | 13.76% | -2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMRE.L and FEMQ.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between JMRE.L and FEMQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Financial Services
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Communication Services
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Industrials
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Basic Materials
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Energy
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Healthcare
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Consumer Defensive
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Utilities
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Real Estate
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
JMRE.L
FEMQ.L
JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMRE.L | FEMQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.73 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.90 | 6.96 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.57 | 23.01 | -2.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMRE.L | FEMQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 3.81 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.68 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.50 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMRE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.64%, which is greater than FEMQ.L's maximum drawdown of -28.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMRE.L and FEMQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMRE.L | FEMQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.64% | -28.13% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -8.78% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.91% | -14.75% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -25.31% | -0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -2.28% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -8.03% | -6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.66% | +0.36% |
Volatility
JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) is 7.44%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMQ.L) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that JMRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMRE.L | FEMQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 8.75% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 14.04% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 16.06% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 14.98% | +11.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 17.49% | +8.66% |
JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMRE.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMQ.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMRE.L vs. FEMQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JMRE.L nor FEMQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JMRE.L and FEMQ.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMRE.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMRE.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FEMQ.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMRE.L and 0.50% for FEMQ.L.
Find the right allocation for JMRE.L and FEMQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer