PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMRE.L achieves a 31.45% return, which is significantly higher than BBDD.L's 10.24% return.


JMRE.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
31.45%
6M
33.94%
1Y
62.35%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*

BBDD.L

1D
-0.22%
1M
5.90%
YTD
10.24%
6M
10.12%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMRE.L
JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)
31.45%25.64%8.21%2.02%-12.02%-1.26%16.34%4.74%
BBDD.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)
10.24%9.41%27.20%20.72%-10.45%29.23%16.11%11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between JMRE.L and BBDD.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.59

The correlation between JMRE.L and BBDD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMRE.L
BBDD.L

Technology

37.5%
35.4%

Financial Services

20.3%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.1%

Communication Services

7.3%
11.5%

Industrials

6.8%
8.4%

Basic Materials

5.9%
1.7%

Energy

4.5%
3.6%

Healthcare

2.7%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
4.8%

Utilities

1.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.8%

Technology

JMRE.L
37.5%
BBDD.L
35.4%

Financial Services

JMRE.L
20.3%
BBDD.L
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JMRE.L
10.7%
BBDD.L
10.1%

Communication Services

JMRE.L
7.3%
BBDD.L
11.5%

Industrials

JMRE.L
6.8%
BBDD.L
8.4%

Basic Materials

JMRE.L
5.9%
BBDD.L
1.7%

Energy

JMRE.L
4.5%
BBDD.L
3.6%

Healthcare

JMRE.L
2.7%
BBDD.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

JMRE.L
2.5%
BBDD.L
4.8%

Utilities

JMRE.L
1.6%
BBDD.L
2.3%

Real Estate

JMRE.L
0.4%
BBDD.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMRE.L
JMRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JMRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JMRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BBDD.L
BBDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BBDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMRE.LBBDD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.50

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.90

3.65

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.57

12.75

+7.82

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is higher than the BBDD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMRE.L and BBDD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMRE.LBBDD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70

2.69

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

1.00

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.96

-0.71

Drawdowns

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMRE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.64%, which is greater than BBDD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMRE.L and BBDD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMRE.LBBDD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.64%

-25.72%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-7.78%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.91%

-21.41%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-21.41%

-4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.22%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-3.73%

-11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.23%

+0.79%

Volatility

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that JMRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMRE.LBBDD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

2.62%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

7.24%

+7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

10.64%

+6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

14.47%

+12.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.15%

16.17%

+9.98%

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMRE.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BBDD.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMRE.L vs. BBDD.L - Dividend Comparison

JMRE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBDD.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.99%1.12%0.99%1.31%1.44%0.94%1.46%0.79%
JMRE.L
JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMRE.L and BBDD.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBDD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBDD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JMRE.L.

JMRE.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BBDD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. JMRE.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while BBDD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMRE.L and 0.05% for BBDD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMRE.L and BBDD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer