JMMF vs. UCIB
JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) and UCIB (ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while UCIB is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Index. JMMF is actively managed, while UCIB is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. JMMF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for UCIB.
Performance
JMMF vs. UCIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMMF achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than UCIB's 20.67% return.
JMMF
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UCIB
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- 20.67%
- 6M
- 21.76%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
JMMF vs. UCIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.42% | 0.17% |
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 20.67% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMMF and UCIB is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMMF vs. UCIB — Risk / Return Rank
JMMF
UCIB
JMMF vs. UCIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMMF | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.42 | 0.38 | +6.04 |
Drawdowns
JMMF vs. UCIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum UCIB drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMMF and UCIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMMF | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -36.94% | +36.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.53% | +15.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -9.06% | +9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.54% | — |
Volatility
JMMF vs. UCIB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMMF | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54% | 31.72% | -31.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 26.74% | -26.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 23.22% | -22.68% |
JMMF vs. UCIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMMF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than UCIB's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMMF vs. UCIB - Dividend Comparison
JMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while UCIB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.59% | 0.20% |
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMMF and UCIB have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMMF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMMF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for UCIB.
JMMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for UCIB.
JMMF is categorized as Money Market, while UCIB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for JMMF and 0.55% for UCIB.
Find the right allocation for JMMF and UCIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer