JMLP.DE vs. QDVF.DE
JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds - JMLP.DE tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend while QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMLP.DE returned 23.96%/yr vs 21.44%/yr for QDVF.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMLP.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
JMLP.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMLP.DE achieves a 27.39% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.
JMLP.DE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 27.39%
- 6M
- 24.82%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- 23.96%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 29.55%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
JMLP.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 27.39% | -5.93% | 44.53% | 15.63% | 34.66% | 55.73% | 7.58% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 67.92% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMLP.DE and QDVF.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020 | 0.76 |
The correlation between JMLP.DE and QDVF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMLP.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
JMLP.DE
QDVF.DE
JMLP.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMLP.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.54 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 7.98 | -1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMLP.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.82 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.79 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.28 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
JMLP.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMLP.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMLP.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMLP.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -65.81% | +43.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -17.23% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.29% | -27.13% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -27.13% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -8.92% | +3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -17.41% | +11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 5.49% | -1.44% |
Volatility
JMLP.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) is 6.65%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that JMLP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMLP.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 7.70% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 20.43% | -5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 24.05% | -5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 26.95% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 28.68% | -7.02% |
JMLP.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMLP.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMLP.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while QDVF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 2.77% | 3.38% | 5.41% | 11.39% | 11.27% | 14.07% | 8.95% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMLP.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JMLP.DE.
JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JMLP.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for JMLP.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer