JMLP.DE vs. MLPP.L
JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) and MLPP.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Energy Equities funds - JMLP.DE tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend while MLPP.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMLP.DE returned 23.96%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for MLPP.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMLP.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MLPP.L.
Performance
JMLP.DE vs. MLPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JMLP.DE is traded in EUR, while MLPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MLPP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMLP.DE achieves a 27.39% return, which is significantly higher than MLPP.L's 20.08% return.
JMLP.DE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 27.39%
- 6M
- 24.82%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- 23.96%
- 10Y*
- —
MLPP.L
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 20.08%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
JMLP.DE vs. MLPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 27.39% | -5.93% | 44.53% | 15.63% | 34.66% | 55.73% | 7.58% |
MLPP.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 20.08% | -9.60% | 30.36% | 15.73% | 39.88% | 47.51% | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMLP.DE and MLPP.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between JMLP.DE and MLPP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMLP.DE vs. MLPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
JMLP.DE
MLPP.L
JMLP.DE vs. MLPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMLP.DE | MLPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 1.47 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 3.22 | +2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMLP.DE | MLPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 0.85 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.96 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | -0.00 | +1.35 |
Drawdowns
JMLP.DE vs. MLPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMLP.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum MLPP.L drawdown of -86.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMLP.DE and MLPP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMLP.DE | MLPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -86.95% | +64.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -9.38% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.29% | -22.49% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -22.49% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -15.21% | +10.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -39.62% | +33.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 4.29% | -0.24% |
Volatility
JMLP.DE vs. MLPP.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) have volatilities of 6.65% and 6.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMLP.DE | MLPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 6.45% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 12.90% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 16.25% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 21.62% | -1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 33.02% | -11.36% |
JMLP.DE vs. MLPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMLP.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPP.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMLP.DE vs. MLPP.L - Dividend Comparison
JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than MLPP.L's 7.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 2.77% | 3.38% | 5.41% | 11.39% | 11.27% | 14.07% | 8.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPP.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.55% | 8.28% | 7.99% | 8.81% | 7.86% | 8.40% | 6.01% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMLP.DE and MLPP.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMLP.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMLP.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPP.L.
JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend, while MLPP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JMLP.DE and 0.50% for MLPP.L.
Find the right allocation for JMLP.DE and MLPP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer