JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) and FCO2.DE (HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - JMLP.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend, while FCO2.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the EU Carbon Emission Allowances (EUA). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JMLP.DE returned 24.31%/yr vs -3.01%/yr for FCO2.DE. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMLP.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for FCO2.DE.

Performance

JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) and HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMLP.DE achieves a 27.39% return, which is significantly higher than FCO2.DE's -10.46% return.

JMLP.DE

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 27.39%
• 6M: 24.82%
• 1Y: 24.53%
• 3Y*: 24.31%
• 5Y*: 23.96%
• 10Y*: —

FCO2.DE

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: -10.46%
• 6M: -8.30%
• 1Y: 5.04%
• 3Y*: -3.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	27.39%	-5.93%	44.53%	15.63%	-6.03%
FCO2.DE HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC	-10.46%	20.70%	-11.00%	-5.14%	-0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between JMLP.DE and FCO2.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022	0.04

The correlation between JMLP.DE and FCO2.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMLP.DE

JMLP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 38
JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
JMLP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
JMLP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JMLP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JMLP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FCO2.DE

FCO2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 12
FCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FCO2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FCO2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FCO2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FCO2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) and HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMLP.DE	FCO2.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	0.19	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	0.44	+1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.06	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	0.16	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.04	0.41	+5.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the FCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMLP.DE and FCO2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMLP.DE	FCO2.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	0.19	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	-0.07	+1.42

Drawdowns

JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMLP.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum FCO2.DE drawdown of -48.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMLP.DE and FCO2.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMLP.DE	FCO2.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.29%	-48.49%	+26.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-31.46%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.29%	-45.60%	+23.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.15%	-24.40%	+19.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-23.38%	+17.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	12.41%	-8.36%

Volatility

JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE) at 5.99%. This indicates that JMLP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCO2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMLP.DE	FCO2.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	5.99%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.30%	22.94%	-7.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.80%	26.69%	-7.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.38%	34.04%	-13.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.66%	34.04%	-12.38%

JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMLP.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FCO2.DE's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMLP.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Dividend Comparison

JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while FCO2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCO2.DE HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	2.77%	3.38%	5.41%	11.39%	11.27%	14.07%	8.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMLP.DE and FCO2.DE in my portfolio?

JMLP.DE and FCO2.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JMLP.DE or FCO2.DE?

On fees, JMLP.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMLP.DE or FCO2.DE?

JMLP.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for FCO2.DE.

What is the main difference between JMLP.DE and FCO2.DE?

JMLP.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while FCO2.DE is Commodities. JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend, while FCO2.DE tracks EU Carbon Emission Allowances (EUA). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JMLP.DE and 0.89% for FCO2.DE.