PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMENX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMENX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multimanager 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JMENX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMENX achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than LTFIX's 8.98% return.


JMENX

1D
1.35%
1M
2.55%
YTD
13.18%
6M
12.91%
1Y
28.17%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*

LTFIX

1D
1.22%
1M
1.76%
YTD
8.98%
6M
8.84%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMENX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMENX
John Hancock Multimanager 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
13.18%18.47%15.40%18.75%-19.64%15.71%20.33%24.78%-9.04%17.65%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.98%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%17.73%16.47%27.27%-9.03%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between JMENX and LTFIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.97

The correlation between JMENX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMENX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMENX
JMENX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JMENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMENX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
JMENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMENX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMENX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multimanager 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JMENX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMENXLTFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.52

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.43

11.07

+1.36

JMENX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMENX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMENX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMENX drawdown since its inception was -32.02%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMENX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMENXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.02%

-52.73%

+20.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-8.71%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.62%

-15.70%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.10%

-26.80%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.63%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-7.62%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.98%

+0.26%

Volatility

JMENX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multimanager 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JMENX) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) at 4.94%. This indicates that JMENX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMENXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

4.94%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

10.36%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

12.53%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

15.57%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

15.88%

+0.65%

JMENX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMENX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMENX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

JMENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, less than LTFIX's 8.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMENX
John Hancock Multimanager 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
5.37%6.08%3.17%3.56%14.07%9.28%3.85%6.44%7.51%2.17%0.00%0.00%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.01%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JMENX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JMENX has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to LTFIX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMENX dropped -32.02% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

JMENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMENX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer