PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBS vs. LGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBS vs. LGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF (LGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBS achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than LGOV's -0.60% return.


JMBS

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.73%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*

LGOV

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.01%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
5.85%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBS vs. LGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.51%8.82%1.53%5.66%-11.40%-0.32%5.80%7.11%
LGOV
First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF
-0.60%9.13%-2.05%4.91%-19.73%-1.93%11.31%11.53%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBS and LGOV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2019

0.67

The correlation between JMBS and LGOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBS vs. LGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBS
JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

LGOV
LGOV Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBS vs. LGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF (LGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMBSLGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.14

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.05

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

3.08

+4.72

JMBS vs. LGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the LGOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBS and LGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMBSLGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

0.84

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

-0.19

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.13

+0.29

Drawdowns

JMBS vs. LGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBS drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum LGOV drawdown of -30.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBS and LGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBSLGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-30.86%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-5.62%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.76%

-12.54%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.68%

-28.14%

+11.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-15.30%

+13.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-13.08%

+9.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.90%

-0.98%

Volatility

JMBS vs. LGOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) is 1.65%, while First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF (LGOV) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that JMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBSLGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

2.71%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

5.15%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

7.01%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

9.07%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.52%

9.24%

-3.72%

JMBS vs. LGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBS has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than LGOV's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBS vs. LGOV - Dividend Comparison

JMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than LGOV's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.19%5.03%5.53%4.38%2.73%1.16%2.92%3.63%0.89%
LGOV
First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF
4.27%4.02%4.03%3.59%1.97%2.58%3.75%3.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBS and LGOV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGOV has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to JMBS (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMBS dropped -16.68% vs LGOV's -30.86%.

On 5-year performance, JMBS leads with 0.74% vs -1.74% for LGOV. On fees, JMBS is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, JMBS has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMBS has performed better with a 0.74% return vs -1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMBS is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LGOV.

JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 4.27% for LGOV.

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for JMBS and 0.70% for LGOV.

JMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBS and LGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer