JMBS vs. CMBS
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS).
JMBS and CMBS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JMBS is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 12, 2018. CMBS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. CMBS (ERISA Only) Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 2012.
Performance
JMBS vs. CMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JMBS vs. CMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.19% | 8.82% | 1.53% | 5.66% | -11.40% | -0.32% | 5.80% | 7.11% | 1.53% |
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | -0.13% | 7.67% | 4.27% | 5.06% | -11.21% | -1.82% | 7.86% | 7.94% | 1.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMBS achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than CMBS's -0.13% return.
JMBS
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
CMBS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JMBS vs. CMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMBS has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than CMBS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JMBS vs. CMBS — Risk / Return Rank
JMBS
CMBS
JMBS vs. CMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMBS | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.98 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 2.05 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 7.83 | -2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMBS | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.19 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.43 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between JMBS and CMBS is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JMBS vs. CMBS - Dividend Comparison
JMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than CMBS's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.58% | 5.03% | 5.53% | 4.38% | 2.73% | 1.16% | 2.92% | 3.63% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 3.52% | 3.45% | 3.31% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 2.46% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.70% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.31% |
Drawdowns
JMBS vs. CMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMBS drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, which is greater than CMBS's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBS and CMBS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMBS | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -15.87% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.01% | -2.44% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | -15.87% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -2.04% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -2.97% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 0.64% | +0.46% |
Volatility
JMBS vs. CMBS - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) at 1.50%. This indicates that JMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JMBS | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 1.50% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 2.63% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.85% | 3.92% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.43% | 5.29% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.54% | 5.77% | -0.23% |