JMBS vs. BEP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JMBS (Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) is Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while BEP (Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, JMBS returned 0.82%/yr vs 4.13%/yr for BEP. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

JMBS vs. BEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBS achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than BEP's 34.43% return.

JMBS

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 6.23%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: 0.82%
• 10Y*: —

BEP

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 34.43%
• 6M: 33.14%
• 1Y: 47.87%
• 3Y*: 12.59%
• 5Y*: 4.13%
• 10Y*: 14.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBS vs. BEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.77%	8.82%	1.53%	5.66%	-11.40%	-0.32%	5.80%	7.11%	1.55%
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.	34.43%	25.65%	-8.23%	9.02%	-26.48%	-13.69%	80.30%	90.75%	-14.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBS and BEP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018	0.16

Return for Risk

JMBS vs. BEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBS

JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 44
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 43
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 41

BEP

BEP Risk / Return Rank: 83
BEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BEP Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BEP Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBS vs. BEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMBS	BEP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.67	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.30	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.29	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	3.37	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.37	7.66	-1.29

JMBS vs. BEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the BEP Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBS and BEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMBS vs. BEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBS drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum BEP drawdown of -53.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBS and BEP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMBS	BEP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.68%	-53.85%	+37.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.05%	-14.25%	+11.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.76%	-31.78%	+24.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.68%	-47.46%	+30.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	-6.26%	+4.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-13.61%	+9.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	6.27%	-5.29%

Volatility

JMBS vs. BEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) is 1.33%, while Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that JMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMBS	BEP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	7.71%	-6.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.35%	19.64%	-16.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.26%	28.81%	-24.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.51%	31.01%	-24.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.52%	30.01%	-24.49%

Dividends

JMBS vs. BEP - Dividend Comparison

JMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than BEP's 4.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.	4.32%	5.53%	6.23%	5.14%	5.05%	4.42%	2.68%	4.42%	7.57%	5.36%	5.99%	6.34%
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.18%	5.03%	5.53%	4.38%	2.73%	1.16%	2.92%	3.63%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMBS and BEP in my portfolio?

JMBS and BEP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMBS or BEP?

BEP has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to JMBS (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMBS dropped -16.68% vs BEP's -53.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.