JMBS vs. ASEC
JMBS (Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and ASEC (American Century Securitized Credit ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMBS charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for ASEC.
Performance
JMBS vs. ASEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JMBS
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 5.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.63%
- 10Y*
- —
ASEC
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMBS vs. ASEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | -0.32% |
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMBS and ASEC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMBS vs. ASEC — Risk / Return Rank
JMBS
ASEC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JMBS vs. ASEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMBS | ASEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMBS vs. ASEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMBS drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, which is greater than ASEC's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBS and ASEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMBS | ASEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -0.46% | -16.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -0.19% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -0.19% | -3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility
JMBS vs. ASEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMBS | ASEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28% | 1.44% | +2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 1.44% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 1.44% | +4.07% |
JMBS vs. ASEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMBS has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than ASEC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMBS vs. ASEC - Dividend Comparison
JMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than ASEC's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.23% | 5.03% | 5.53% | 4.38% | 2.73% | 1.16% | 2.92% | 3.63% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMBS and ASEC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASEC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASEC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for JMBS.
JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 0.46% for ASEC.
They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for JMBS and 0.29% for ASEC.
Find the right allocation for JMBS and ASEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer