PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (acc) (JMBE.DE) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBE.DE achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than GASF.DE's 7.95% return.


JMBE.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.85%
6M
0.94%
YTD
0.54%
1Y
7.24%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*

GASF.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
1.40%
6M
6.61%
YTD
7.95%
1Y
8.98%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMBE.DE
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (acc)
0.54%11.00%0.03%7.02%-18.34%-3.60%3.18%2.29%
GASF.DE
Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc
7.95%-6.82%10.85%-2.28%0.91%16.54%-0.76%-8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBE.DE and GASF.DE is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBE.DE
JMBE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JMBE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

GASF.DE
GASF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GASF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GASF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GASF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GASF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GASF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (acc) (JMBE.DE) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMBE.DEGASF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.84

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

8.54

-2.50

JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the GASF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBE.DE and GASF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBE.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.18%, which is greater than GASF.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBE.DE and GASF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBE.DEGASF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-13.75%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.73%

-3.40%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-11.00%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.72%

-13.75%

-13.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.01%

-1.53%

-4.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-6.06%

-4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.12%

+0.08%

Volatility

JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (acc) (JMBE.DE) is 1.07%, while Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that JMBE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GASF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBE.DEGASF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

1.48%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.64%

3.45%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.51%

5.35%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.55%

6.68%

+1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.60%

7.71%

+1.89%

JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBE.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GASF.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBE.DE vs. GASF.DE - Dividend Comparison

JMBE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GASF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GASF.DE
Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc
1.98%2.36%2.35%2.63%2.73%2.40%1.99%
JMBE.DE
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBE.DE and GASF.DE have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GASF.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GASF.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMBE.DE.

JMBE.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified Hedge TR EUR, while GASF.DE tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBE.DE and 0.24% for GASF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBE.DE and GASF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer