JMBA.L vs. EMHG.L
JMBA.L (JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EMHG.L (iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - JMBA.L tracks the J.P. Morgan Emerging Market Risk Aware Bond Index while EMHG.L tracks the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global Diversified Core. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMBA.L returned 1.31%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EMHG.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMBA.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EMHG.L.
Performance
JMBA.L vs. EMHG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JMBA.L is traded in USD, while EMHG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMHG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMBA.L achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than EMHG.L's 1.42% return.
JMBA.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 9.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- —
EMHG.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.40%
- 10Y*
- —
JMBA.L vs. EMHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMBA.L JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.62% | 13.26% | 2.01% | 9.51% | -16.13% | -2.45% | 5.36% | 3.30% |
EMHG.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.42% | 21.96% | 3.55% | 14.71% | -28.49% | -3.39% | 6.66% | 5.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMBA.L and EMHG.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between JMBA.L and EMHG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMBA.L vs. EMHG.L — Risk / Return Rank
JMBA.L
EMHG.L
JMBA.L vs. EMHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JMBA.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (EMHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMBA.L | EMHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.30 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 4.23 | +4.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMBA.L vs. EMHG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMBA.L drawdown since its inception was -26.75%, smaller than the maximum EMHG.L drawdown of -44.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBA.L and EMHG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMBA.L | EMHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.75% | -44.35% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -7.32% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.30% | -13.08% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.91% | -43.78% | +17.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -1.65% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.29% | -13.87% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 2.25% | -1.20% |
Volatility
JMBA.L vs. EMHG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JMBA.L) is 0.77%, while iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (EMHG.L) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that JMBA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMBA.L | EMHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 1.98% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.37% | 7.76% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.19% | 10.00% | -4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.44% | 14.59% | -6.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.53% | 15.23% | -4.70% |
JMBA.L vs. EMHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMBA.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMHG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMBA.L vs. EMHG.L - Dividend Comparison
JMBA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHG.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 5.72% | 5.71% | 5.74% | 5.61% | 5.64% | 3.93% | 3.85% | 4.73% | 3.64% |
JMBA.L JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMBA.L and EMHG.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMBA.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMBA.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMHG.L.
JMBA.L tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Market Risk Aware Bond Index, while EMHG.L tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global Diversified Core. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBA.L and 0.50% for EMHG.L.
Find the right allocation for JMBA.L and EMHG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer