PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) and Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBA.DE achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than XUEB.DE's 5.18% return.


JMBA.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.65%
6M
3.04%
YTD
4.34%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*

XUEB.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
6M
3.56%
YTD
5.18%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JMBA.DE
JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
4.34%0.84%7.77%5.79%-10.80%5.58%0.54%
XUEB.DE
Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C
5.18%1.23%11.99%7.34%-14.37%5.65%-10.39%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBA.DE and XUEB.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2020

0.85

The correlation between JMBA.DE and XUEB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBA.DE
JMBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XUEB.DE
XUEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XUEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) and Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMBA.DEXUEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

0.84

+2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

1.20

+9.01

JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the XUEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBA.DE and XUEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.66%, which is greater than XUEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBA.DE and XUEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBA.DEXUEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.66%

-21.07%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-14.33%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-14.33%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.09%

-17.41%

+3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-8.83%

+7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-11.21%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

10.06%

-9.02%

Volatility

JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) at 1.00%. This indicates that JMBA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBA.DEXUEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.00%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

3.99%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

21.57%

-15.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

12.71%

-4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

12.80%

-2.10%

JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBA.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XUEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBA.DE vs. XUEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JMBA.DE nor XUEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBA.DE and XUEB.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMBA.DE.

JMBA.DE tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index, while XUEB.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBA.DE and 0.25% for XUEB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBA.DE and XUEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer