PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0Q.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JMBA.DE having a 4.34% return and IS0Q.DE slightly higher at 4.48%.


JMBA.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.65%
6M
3.04%
YTD
4.34%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*

IS0Q.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
1.15%
6M
2.59%
YTD
4.48%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
3.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMBA.DE
JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
4.34%0.84%7.77%5.79%-10.80%5.58%-4.14%-7.72%
IS0Q.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.48%-3.70%12.34%4.23%-6.55%7.84%-2.78%0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBA.DE and IS0Q.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.70

The correlation between JMBA.DE and IS0Q.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBA.DE
JMBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IS0Q.DE
IS0Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IS0Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0Q.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMBA.DEIS0Q.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.38

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

6.80

+3.40

JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the IS0Q.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBA.DE and IS0Q.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.66%, roughly equal to the maximum IS0Q.DE drawdown of -26.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBA.DE and IS0Q.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBA.DEIS0Q.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.66%

-26.03%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-2.99%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-11.02%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.09%

-11.02%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-2.21%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-7.55%

-3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.05%

-0.01%

Volatility

JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0Q.DE) at 0.98%. This indicates that JMBA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS0Q.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBA.DEIS0Q.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

0.98%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

3.55%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

5.41%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

7.04%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

8.76%

+1.94%

JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBA.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IS0Q.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBA.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Dividend Comparison

JMBA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IS0Q.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS0Q.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.51%5.61%5.36%5.07%4.31%3.54%4.14%4.58%4.69%4.55%4.51%5.13%
JMBA.DE
JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBA.DE and IS0Q.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMBA.DE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMBA.DE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS0Q.DE.

JMBA.DE tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index, while IS0Q.DE tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBA.DE and 0.50% for IS0Q.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBA.DE and IS0Q.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer