PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMADX vs. CRDOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMADX vs. CRDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Managed Account Shares Non-Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMADX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMADX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than CRDOX's 2.03% return.


JMADX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.23%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*

CRDOX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.49%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
8.20%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMADX vs. CRDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JMADX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Non-Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
1.77%7.97%8.05%8.31%-13.62%4.29%2.60%
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
2.03%7.48%8.69%8.06%-10.62%2.66%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JMADX and CRDOX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.77

The correlation between JMADX and CRDOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMADX vs. CRDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMADX
JMADX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JMADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMADX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
JMADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMADX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDOX
CRDOX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CRDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMADX vs. CRDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Managed Account Shares Non-Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMADX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMADXCRDOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.74

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.12

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

13.85

-2.12

JMADX vs. CRDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the CRDOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMADX and CRDOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMADXCRDOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.99

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.79

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.86

-0.41

Drawdowns

JMADX vs. CRDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMADX drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than CRDOX's maximum drawdown of -15.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMADX and CRDOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMADXCRDOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-15.92%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-2.70%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.25%

-4.66%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.09%

-15.92%

-2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-3.53%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.61%

+0.05%

Volatility

JMADX vs. CRDOX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Managed Account Shares Non-Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMADX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) at 0.88%. This indicates that JMADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMADXCRDOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.88%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

2.34%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

2.83%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.06%

4.15%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.61%

4.03%

+2.58%

JMADX vs. CRDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMADX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDOX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMADX vs. CRDOX - Dividend Comparison

JMADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than CRDOX's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
6.61%5.18%6.96%6.86%5.82%2.73%0.33%0.00%
JMADX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Non-Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
6.97%7.15%6.54%4.59%4.52%5.33%4.93%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMADX and CRDOX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMADX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to CRDOX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMADX dropped -24.75% vs CRDOX's -15.92%.

CRDOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMADX and CRDOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer