PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMAB.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JMAB.L is traded in GBP, while SEMC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SEMC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMAB.L achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than SEMC.L's 2.30% return.


JMAB.L

1D
0.33%
1M
2.07%
YTD
1.93%
6M
1.52%
1Y
12.20%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*

SEMC.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.31%
YTD
2.30%
6M
2.17%
1Y
9.29%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMAB.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
1.93%5.64%3.60%3.51%-6.11%-1.18%1.75%2.11%
SEMC.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.30%2.50%9.09%2.06%0.58%1.54%-0.46%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between JMAB.L and SEMC.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019

0.78

The correlation between JMAB.L and SEMC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMAB.L
JMAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JMAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMC.L
SEMC.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SEMC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMAB.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMAB.LSEMC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.69

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.77

7.88

-0.11

JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMAB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SEMC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMAB.L and SEMC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMAB.LSEMC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.61

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.53

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.35

-0.17

Drawdowns

JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMAB.L drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, which is greater than SEMC.L's maximum drawdown of -12.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMAB.L and SEMC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMAB.LSEMC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-12.52%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.38%

-3.43%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.77%

-7.69%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.80%

-11.89%

-1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.29%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-4.98%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.18%

+0.39%

Volatility

JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMAB.L) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L) at 1.50%. This indicates that JMAB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEMC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMAB.LSEMC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

1.50%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.36%

4.15%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.91%

5.74%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.62%

7.61%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.51%

8.18%

+1.33%

JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMAB.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMC.L's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMAB.L vs. SEMC.L - Dividend Comparison

JMAB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEMC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMAB.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEMC.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.78%6.51%5.02%5.04%3.98%3.97%4.77%5.18%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMAB.L and SEMC.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMAB.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMAB.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for SEMC.L.

Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMAB.L and 0.42% for SEMC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMAB.L and SEMC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer