PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMAB.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JMAB.L is traded in GBP, while EMD5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMD5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMAB.L achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than EMD5.L's -1.42% return.


JMAB.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.04%
6M
1.28%
YTD
1.55%
1Y
8.85%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*

EMD5.L

1D
-0.99%
1M
-2.04%
6M
0.33%
YTD
-1.42%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JMAB.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
1.55%5.64%3.61%3.51%-6.11%-1.18%0.43%
EMD5.L
L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-1.42%2.30%10.30%2.45%0.24%0.67%-0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between JMAB.L and EMD5.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.64

The correlation between JMAB.L and EMD5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMAB.L
JMAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JMAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EMD5.L
EMD5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EMD5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMAB.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMAB.LEMD5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.07

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.37

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

0.91

+4.48

JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMAB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the EMD5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMAB.L and EMD5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMAB.L drawdown since its inception was -31.26%, which is greater than EMD5.L's maximum drawdown of -12.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMAB.L and EMD5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMAB.LEMD5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.26%

-12.98%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.38%

-6.62%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.77%

-7.39%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.71%

-12.98%

-9.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.63%

-3.43%

-12.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-4.59%

-18.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.71%

-1.07%

Volatility

JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMAB.L) is 1.35%, while L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that JMAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMD5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMAB.LEMD5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.12%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

5.37%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

6.74%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

8.09%

+9.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

7.96%

+10.95%

JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMAB.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EMD5.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMAB.L vs. EMD5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JMAB.L nor EMD5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EMD5.L
L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%5.66%6.09%4.60%3.04%1.25%
JMAB.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMAB.L and EMD5.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMD5.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMD5.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMAB.L.

JMAB.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while EMD5.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMAB.L and 0.25% for EMD5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMAB.L and EMD5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer