JLHAX vs. PMTIX
JLHAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio) and PMTIX (Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, JLHAX returned 9.53%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for PMTIX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JLHAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for PMTIX.
Performance
JLHAX vs. PMTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLHAX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than PMTIX's 5.67% return. Over the past 10 years, JLHAX has outperformed PMTIX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while PMTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.84% annualized return.
JLHAX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 22.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
PMTIX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 5.67%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
JLHAX vs. PMTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio | 9.91% | 16.08% | 11.11% | 15.50% | -19.47% | 13.90% | 18.27% | 22.86% | -8.60% | 16.86% |
PMTIX Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund | 5.67% | 13.25% | 12.86% | 15.11% | -16.81% | 12.70% | 14.71% | 22.40% | -7.45% | 18.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between JLHAX and PMTIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2006 | 0.98 |
The correlation between JLHAX and PMTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JLHAX vs. PMTIX — Risk / Return Rank
JLHAX
PMTIX
JLHAX vs. PMTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JLHAX | PMTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.52 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 10.99 | +1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JLHAX vs. PMTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLHAX drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, which is greater than PMTIX's maximum drawdown of -52.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLHAX and PMTIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLHAX | PMTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -52.14% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -5.85% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -9.62% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | -23.05% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.14% | -25.87% | -3.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.33% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -6.78% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.34% | +0.43% |
Volatility
JLHAX vs. PMTIX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX) at 3.28%. This indicates that JLHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JLHAX | PMTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.28% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.75% | 6.72% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.39% | 8.09% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 10.62% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 11.24% | +2.66% |
JLHAX vs. PMTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JLHAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than PMTIX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
JLHAX vs. PMTIX - Dividend Comparison
JLHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, less than PMTIX's 9.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLHAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio | 8.02% | 8.81% | 2.68% | 2.53% | 20.06% | 9.76% | 5.83% | 11.13% | 13.05% | 6.74% | 6.80% | 6.36% |
PMTIX Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund | 9.17% | 9.69% | 9.60% | 4.26% | 10.05% | 8.87% | 6.37% | 6.49% | 8.21% | 5.87% | 3.97% | 9.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, JLHAX and PMTIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JLHAX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to PMTIX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLHAX dropped -56.42% vs PMTIX's -52.14%.
JLHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JLHAX and PMTIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer