PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLGQX vs. JMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLGQX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 (JLGQX) and JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLGQX achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly higher than JMSIX's 1.35% return.


JLGQX

1D
0.66%
1M
6.69%
YTD
7.86%
6M
6.50%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*

JMSIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.85%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLGQX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLGQX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4
7.86%14.08%35.14%34.61%-25.39%18.17%55.99%39.17%0.47%36.87%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
1.35%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between JLGQX and JMSIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLGQX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLGQX
JLGQX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
JLGQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLGQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLGQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
JLGQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLGQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLGQX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 (JLGQX) and JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLGQXJMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.60

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.59

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.74

14.87

-11.14

JLGQX vs. JMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLGQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the JMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLGQX and JMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLGQXJMSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.30

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.76

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.79

+0.15

Drawdowns

JLGQX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLGQX drawdown since its inception was -31.84%, which is greater than JMSIX's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLGQX and JMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLGQXJMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.84%

-18.40%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.82%

-1.62%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.51%

-2.31%

-19.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.23%

-11.39%

-19.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-2.57%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

0.39%

+5.50%

Volatility

JLGQX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 (JLGQX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) at 0.82%. This indicates that JLGQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLGQXJMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

0.82%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

1.88%

+9.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.60%

2.53%

+13.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

3.73%

+16.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

3.87%

+18.16%

JLGQX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLGQX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLGQX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison

JLGQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than JMSIX's 6.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JLGQX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4
10.61%11.45%2.01%0.15%3.44%14.95%5.31%12.99%15.98%14.79%0.00%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
6.02%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLGQX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLGQX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to JMSIX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLGQX dropped -31.84% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.

JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLGQX and JMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer